🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.