🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable little “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a sizeable but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a shuttered park, government authorities and animal rights activists.

But those most familiar with the whales say the intense discussion over their fate often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been closely studied by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the Canadian government disallowed the export of the belugas to China, the controversial amusement park near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the authorities funds the expense of keeping them alive. Canada’s marine resources official has refused that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain position.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and social skills point to they are remarkably smart creatures – something Kristy Burgess discovered directly.

She spent three years as a whale caretaker, a position that involved gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so magical and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nevertheless surprised by the nuances and unique traits in their characters. She developed a particular love for a pair of whales with different personalities.

“One whale chose me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “They transformed the way I perceive connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s interaction with the whales progressed against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her three years at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, passed away. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park links to natural mortality, but which activists say reflects the substandard environment in which they were housed.

The park did not operate to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand effects of the shutdown. “Structural materials is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and navigate with pieces in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not reply to a inquiry, but previously asserted: “The whales … get far better medical attention and around the clock supervision than any human in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was dismissed from the park in early March following the demise of Eos, an sick beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the park thought particulars of the death were disclosed to the press and she was released not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and staff members in distress. She says the park’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” task, adding any efforts to put down even a one beluga would require “significant staff”, equipment and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports requests for the whales to be taken promptly from the park, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official turned down a request to export the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the request would have meant a ongoing life in captivity and a reversion to public entertainment,” the official commented. “As society, we know that belugas are meant for the ocean, not in pools for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing authorize an relocation that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks reflect a broader incorrect perception of the facts of life for belugas born in captivity.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers attempt to find a resolution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a important part of nourishment for Inuit communities.

A proposed sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received regulatory clearance, has proven highly debated. The prospective location, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, is not yet built. Advocates remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a permanent solution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an experiment” in the whales’ well-being.

Some experts say the idea of a protected habitat reflects a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible approach in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, director of the sanctuary project, said the site will mimic the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|