🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, after a latest legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Reconsider Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an expanded group of eleven justices. The court also overturned a previous decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent development in a protracted legal battle over whether the former president has the legal right and valid reason to send national guard forces in the city. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was started in due to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has argued that federal officials at the immigration center in south Portland were facing threats, while city and state officials assert that municipal police have control of the situation.

In defiance of descriptions of Portland as a conflict zone, residents have been sharing footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and organizing activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in Portland issued two temporary restraining orders this period – one blocking the federalization of the state troops, and another stopping the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to evade the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of state troops – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, preventing the actual deployment of the forces.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under review together – by a group of eleven justices.

“This decision shows that the truth matters and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable. The founding document restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the president cannot send the armed forces into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue protecting state legislation, principles, and autonomy as this case moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.”